Predators

We don't have a name for them, let's get romantic

Predators(2010) introduces an intriguing new concept, though its cast choices are somewhat questionable. The writing is serviceable, not exceptional, but not outright bad either. Fortunately, it avoids any heavy-handed theological or political narratives. While it does feature a diverse cast and the familiar trope of a strong, independent woman, these elements fit the story naturally rather than feeling forced.

One oddity is that every character, despite their varied backgrounds, conveniently speaks English. This is likely a simplification for the audience, and while noticeable, it's understandable. Midway through the film, a new character is introduced, and this particular addition stands out as a highlight.

Chronologically, Predators is set around six years after The Predator (2018). The decision to place the story on an entirely separate planet was a clever move, making the writers' job easier while allowing them to sidestep continuity issues with Earth-based events. The character writing is semi-believable, and the film adheres fairly well to the established lore, though it does so selectively, preserving certain details through the memory of a single character rather than as a broader historical knowledge.

The introduction of new alien creatures adds to the film's world-building. These creatures appear to be trained, possibly by the Predators themselves, reinforcing the idea that this planet is used as a hunting preserve for elite warriors. The film plays with the "hunters becoming the hunted" trope but adds an interesting twist by having the Predators specifically choose their prey from different warlike backgrounds.

The depiction of Predator technology expands upon what we've seen before, introducing new gear and tactics that make sense within the context of an off-world setting. Unlike Prey (2022), where the Predator felt out of place despite being set just 300 years prior, Predators manages to keep them grounded in their established lore. However, one line from the main female character, "We don't have a name for them", further exposes a plot hole in The Predator (2018), where an entire scene was dedicated to naming the alien species "Predators" and debating the accuracy of the term. This inconsistency highlights how newer films have gradually eroded the franchise's internal logic.

Visually, the film strikes a balance between modern CGI and the practical aesthetics of the original Predator. It clearly respects its predecessors, though some CGI elements, particularly the animated creatures, feel outdated even for 2010. Thankfully, this is easy to overlook due to the film's engaging action and its overall commitment to the Predator legacy.

That being said, there are a few missteps. The Yakuza character wielding a katana produces a metallic scraping noise, something that real katanas simply wouldn't make. Additionally, the way the Predators interact with the "doctor" character contradicts their established hunting code. Traditionally, unarmed individuals are not considered valid prey, yet here, a Predator is shown approaching an unarmed and seemingly helpless target. The Russian soldier, on the other hand, embodies the Predator code far more accurately.

The concept of different Predator subspecies, where larger, seemingly mutated "Super Predators" hunt the classic ones, is an interesting twist, though it doesn't entirely align with prior lore. It adds a new layer to their society but also raises questions about their biology and hierarchy.

A minor romantic subplot between the two main characters ultimately leads nowhere, making it feel like an unnecessary addition.

Overall, Predators is a middle-of-the-road entry in the franchise. It has its flaws, but it also contributes important elements to the Predator mythos. While not groundbreaking, it remains an entertaining and respectable addition to the series.